Analysis Of Service Quality, Facilities, And Price On Student Satisfaction At Asmah Zaijuli Hamid School, Medan

Authors

  • Ernita Ernita Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Nurafrina Siregar Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
  • Elfitra Desy Surya Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37676/jmea.v5i4.1870

Keywords:

Service Quality, Facilities, Price, Student Satisfaction

Abstract

Student satisfaction is a key measure used to evaluate how good the services provided by educational institutions. How happy student satisfaction is influenced by several factors, such as the quality of service they receive, the facilities available, and the price they pay. This study aims to examine how Service Quality, Facilities, and Price each Student Satisfaction. The research uses a quantitative method and survey approach. Data was gathered by giving questionnaires to students selected using purposive sampling techniques. The data analysis includes validity tests, reliability tests, classical assumption tests, and multiple linear regression analysis. The findings reveal that Service Quality and Price each have a clear, positive impact on Student Satisfaction, while Facilities do not have a significant partial effect. Simultaneously, Service Quality, Facilities, and Price have a significant effect on Student Satisfaction. The R-Square value of 0.740 indicates that 74% of changes in Student Satisfaction can be explained by these the three independent variables in this study. This clearly shows that service quality and price suitability are the most dominant factors in increasing student satisfaction. Therefore, educational institutions should prioritize improving service quality and ensuring price suitability with the benefits received by students in order to enhance overall satisfaction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Akbar, M. A. (2017). Model pengambilan keputusan mahasiswa memilih kuliah di STIE Eka Prasetya Medan. Sumber, 5(2017), 292.

2. Akbar, M. A., & Situmorang, I. R. (2021). Pengaruh perceived value terhadap loyalitas dengan variabel kepuasan konsumen sebagai variabel moderasi pada UMKM di Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Sosial, 5(2), 203–211.

3. Alamsyah, F. S., & Bakti, R. (2023). Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan, fasilitas dan lokasi terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa STIE GICI Pondokgede. ELISTE: Economics Learning Experience & Social Thinking Education Journal, 3(2).

4. Chandra, J. (2021). Pengaruh faktor lokasi, produk dan harga terhadap keputusan pembelian konsumen di CV. Creative Centre. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen, 7(2), 199–214.

5. Gultom, P. (2020). Pengaruh ekuitas merek, harga dan lokasi terhadap keputusan pembelian konsumen pada Quality Fried Chicken Jalan Ismaliyah Medan. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis: Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen, 6(1), 44–53.

6. Handayani, T. M., & Moktar, B. (2023). Analysis of the effect of segmentation and targeting on sales.

a. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Eka Prasetya Penelitian Ilmu Manajemen, 9(1), 10–19.

7. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles of Marketing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

8. Lazuardi, D., Gustina, I., & Rinaldi, M. (2022). Relationship of location, price, and promotion to interest in buying gordyn at Soni Interior House. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(5), 3795–3800.

9. Manik, D. E. M., Gultom, P., & Sebayang, Y. B. (2022). The effect of facilities and trust on customer satisfaction in the use of digital facilities at PT Bank Central Asia Tbk KCU Asia Branch. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 12(2), 2465–2468.

10. Nasution, E. S., & Rinaldi, M. (2021). Pengaruh promosi dan kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan sepeda motor pada PT Alfa Scorpii Medan. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Eka Prasetya, 7(1), 66–78.

11. Rahardi, S., Karamang, E., & Mubarak, D. A. A. (2024). Pengaruh harga, lokasi, kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa (Studi pada Universitas Indonesia Membangun). JEMSI (Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Akuntansi), 10(1), 552–561. https://doi.org/10.35870/jemsi.v10i1.1976

12. Sangadji, E. M., & Sopiah. (2013). Perilaku Konsumen: Pendekatan Praktis. Yogyakarta: Andi.

13. Siregar, Nurafrina. (2017). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi minat beli konsumen dalam menggunakan IndiHome sebagai penyedia jasa internet di Kota Medan. Jumant, 7(1), 65–76.

14. Siregar, Nurafrina. (2018). Analisis produk dan citra koperasi terhadap wirausaha koperasi dalam meningkatkan industri rumah tangga. Jumant, 9(1), 79–93.

15. Siregar, Nurafrina. (2025). Competitive advantage approach model strategy against entrepreneurial marketing performance.

16. Siregar, Nurafrina., & Elfikri, M. (2022). Pengaruh lokasi, promosi, dan fasilitas terhadap kepuasan konsumen. SOSEK: Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi, 3(1), 1–9.

17. Tumangger, E. E. E., & Assyifa, Z. (2022). Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan mahasiswa Smart Fast Global Education Pekanbaru. SHARING: Journal of Islamic Economics, Management and Business, 1(1), 16–25.

18. Yuliati, A. L. (2016). Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan terhadap kepuasan pelanggan pada JNE Cabang Bandung. Jurnal Manajemen, 11(2), 266.

19. Yuniarti, V. S. (2015). Perilaku Konsumen. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-31

How to Cite

Ernita, E., Siregar , N., & Surya , E. D. (2026). Analysis Of Service Quality, Facilities, And Price On Student Satisfaction At Asmah Zaijuli Hamid School, Medan. Journal of Management, Economic, and Accounting, 5(4), 2663–2672. https://doi.org/10.37676/jmea.v5i4.1870

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Oktober

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ernita Ernita, Nurafrina Siregar , Elfitra Desy Surya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)