Public Service Innovation Strategy In Maintaining The Integrity Zone Predicate At The Banten Regional Office Of The Directorate General Of Customs And Excise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37676/jmea.v5i3.1669Keywords:
Integrity Zone, Corruption Free Area, Clean and Serving Bureaucratic AreaAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the efforts or strategies undertaken by the Banten Regional Office of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise to sustain the development of the Integrity Zone, which has been awarded the titles of Corruption-Free Zone (WBK) and Clean and Service-Oriented Bureaucracy Zone (WBBM). The strategies analyzed include what has been done and what should be done in the management of human resources and public service innovation. The method used in this study was a descriptive qualitative approach, data collection was carried out through focus group discussion, interviews and a review of documentation. The focus group discussion was attended by members of the Integrity Zone Development Team at the Banten Regional Office, while the interviews were conducted with competent officials at Integrity Zone Development Team at Banten Regional Office of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise. The results of the study indicate that the internal conditions of the Banten Regional Office of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise are relatively strong, where strengths are more dominant than weaknesses. In addition, external conditions indicate that the Banten Regional Office of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise has greater opportunities than threats so that it is able to respond well to external opportunities. This condition reflects the commitment and efforts of all levels of the Banten Regional Office of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise to eradicate corruption and improve the quality of public services in order to maintain the WBK and WBBM Integrity Zone.
Downloads
References
1. Assauri, S. (2013). Strategic management: Sustainable competitive advantages. PT Raja Grafindo Persada
2. Azzunaika, R., & Havidani, A. (2022). Strategi pelayanan publik Polres Cilegon sebagai satuan kerja berpredikat wilayah bebas korupsi dan wilayah birokrasi bersih melayani. Jurnal Penelitian Administrasi Publik, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30996/jpap.v8i2.6180
3. Firdaus, M., Rosita, W., Diyanto, H., & Supratikta H. (2023). Optimizing organizational performance through strategic human capital management. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 3(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v3i2.634
4. Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010–2025. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2010 Nomor 145.
5. Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dan Bebas dari Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 75.
6. Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 6.
7. Kementerian Keuangan. (2012). Keputusan Menteri keuangan Nomor 185/KMK.01/2012 tentang Perubahan atas Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 345/KMK.01/2011 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi Kementerian Keuangan Tahun 2010-2014.
8. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara. (2003). Keputusan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Nomor 63/KEP/M.PAN/7/2023 tentang Pedoman Umum Pelayanan Publik.Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2020–2024. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 441.
9. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 90 Tahun 2021 tentang Pembangunan dan Evaluasi Zona Integritas menuju WBK dan WBBM di instansi Pemerintah.
10. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 91 Tahun 2021 tentang pembinaan inovasi pelayanan publik.
11. Marjohan, M., Supratikta, H., Hifny, M., Turnip, J. S., Nur’aini, E., Yansyah, R., & Nurayani, A. (2025). Strategi, alat dan platform keuangan digital: Dampaknya pada motivasi kerja karyawan dalam tinjauan literatur. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 8(3), 797–804. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v8i3.1139
12. Marjohan, M., Supratikta, H., & Pranoto. (2025). Manajemen strategik modern. Literasi Langsung Terbit.
13. Mogi, A., & Akbar, A. (2025). Peran lingkungan kerja dalam meningkatkan kinerja karyawan pada CV Tirta Sasmita Pamulang Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Menara, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.65978/jm.v2i2.43
14. Nugroho, R. (2019). Public policy: Dinamika kebijakan, analisis kebijakan, manajemen kebijakan. Elex Media Komputindo.
15. Sinambela, L. P. (2016). Reformasi pelayanan publik: Teori, kebijakan, dan implementasi. Bumi Aksara.
16. Sugiyanti, H., & Mustofa, A. (2025). Evaluation of integrity zones in improving services in the work units of the East Java Provincial Government. Journal Publicuho, 8(1), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v8i1.680
17. Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
18. Nurdin. (2019). Reformasi birokrasi dan pelayanan publik. Pena Nusantara.
19. Rangkuti, F. (2018). Analisis SWOT: Teknik membedah kasus bisnis. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
20. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
21. Sutrisno, E. (2020). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Kencana.
22. Suwarno, Y. (2018). Inovasi di sektor publik. STIA-LAN Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Agustina Mogi, Hadi Supratikta, Nurhadi Nurhadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
