DOWNLOAD ARTIKEL TAMPLATE
JOURNAL DETAILS
Peer Reviewers
Social Sciences Journal recognizes the essential contribution of independent peer reviewers to the quality, integrity, and relevance of scholarly publication. Reviewers provide confidential, evidence-based recommendations; the Editor-in-Chief or assigned editor retains sole responsibility for the final editorial decision. Manuscripts are matched with reviewers according to subject expertise and are evaluated through the journal's double-blind peer-review process.
15Publicly listed reviewers
4International reviewers
11National reviewers
INTInternational Reviewers
Prof. Irina Igorevna Sokolova
Affiliation: Don State Technical University, Russia
Expertise: Economics, international business, and logistics
Prof. Anna Vladimirovna Veriga
Affiliation: Donetsk Academy of Public Administration and Management, Russia
Expertise: Economics, accounting, and auditing
Prof. Emmanuel Ivorgba
Affiliation: Global Interfaith University, United States
Expertise: Management and interdisciplinary social sciences
Prof. Alexandru Lucian Manole
Affiliation: ARTIFEX University, Romania
Expertise: Accounting, economics, and financial management
NATNational Reviewers
Hestu Nugroho Warasto, S.E., M.Si.
Affiliation: Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia
Expertise: Finance and human resource management
Herry Novrianda, S.E., M.M.
Affiliation: Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
Expertise: Management, marketing, and entrepreneurship
Budi Al-Amin, S.E., M.M.
Affiliation: Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Kampus Kota Surakarta, Indonesia
Expertise: Accounting and accounting information systems
Dr. Nizwan Zukhri, S.E., M.M.
Affiliation: Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
Expertise: Economics, regional development, and management
Berto Usman, S.E., M.M.Si., Ph.D.
Affiliation: Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Expertise: Finance, accounting, and sustainability
Dra. Brigida Endah Nuraeni, M.M.
Affiliation: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Bentara Persada, Batam, Indonesia
Expertise: Management, marketing, and consumer behavior
Dr. Desita Rahayu, S.IP., M.Si.
Affiliation: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Bengkulu, Indonesia
Expertise: Public policy and public service management
Dr. Muhammad Roy Purwanto, M.Ag.
Affiliation: Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia
Expertise: Islamic studies, social policy, and education
Widya Handini, B.Sc., M.Sc., CIQaR
Affiliation: Institut Pahlawan 12, Indonesia
Expertise: Public administration and environmental policy
Prof. Dr. Sugeng Suharto
Affiliation: Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Expertise: Public administration, governance, and public policy
Reviewer Selection and Responsibilities
Reviewers are selected on the basis of relevant disciplinary expertise, research and publication experience, independence, availability, and the absence of disqualifying conflicts of interest. Reviewer recommendations are advisory and must be supported by clear scholarly reasoning.
ConfidentialityReviewers must treat manuscripts, data, correspondence, and review records as confidential and must not use unpublished material for personal advantage.
Conflicts of InterestReviewers must disclose relevant financial, institutional, collaborative, competitive, or personal interests and decline the assignment when impartiality may be compromised.
Objective AssessmentReviews must address originality, methodological soundness, ethical compliance, clarity, evidence, contribution, and relevance to the journal's focus and scope.
Responsible Technology UseReviewers must not upload confidential manuscripts or identifiable review material to public generative-AI systems or other unauthorized third-party services.
Independence and Public Disclosure
- Each research manuscript is normally evaluated by at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise.
- Reviewer identity is concealed from authors, and author identity is concealed from reviewers, in accordance with the journal's double-blind review policy.
- Payment status, institutional affiliation, nationality, reputation, or personal relationships must not influence reviewer selection, review reports, or editorial decisions.
- Public listing is limited to reviewers who have consented to disclosure. The list does not identify which manuscript was reviewed by any individual.
- Names, affiliations, areas of expertise, consent records, and scholarly identifiers should be reviewed and updated at least annually.
Transparency note Reviewer inclusion on this page indicates a recognized reviewing role or availability to review within the journal's subject areas; it does not confer editorial authority and must not be interpreted as endorsement of every article published by the journal.
Reference frameworks: COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers; Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing; Scopus Content Policy and Selection. Page updated: August 2026.
