Language Typology In Barrier Islands Of Sumatra: A Phonological Comparison Between Enggano And Mentawai Language

Authors

  • Engga Zakaria Sangian Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Merry Rullyanti Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Dhanu Ario Putra Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37676/mj.v3i3.1832

Keywords:

Enggano Language, Mentawai Language, Phonology

Abstract

Enggano and Mentawai are languages of the barrier islands off the western coast of Sumatra, yet the extent of their phonological relationship remains insufficiently defined. This study examines their phonological relationship and associated cultural correspondence, with particular attention to nasal sounds. A qualitative descriptive design was combined with an ethnolinguistic field approach. The linguistic data consist of a 200-item Swadesh list in Enggano and Mentawai and ten supplementary items selected to examine nasal realizations. Recordings and lexical data were organized through ELAN and FLEx, while representative sound segments were inspected with Praat and the lexical relationship was calculated lexicostatistically. The analysis identifies 36 cognate items from the 200-word comparison, producing a cognate percentage of 18%, which places the relationship in the stock/group range used in the study. Nasal realizations also show systematic differences, with Enggano displaying stronger nasal correspondence with adjacent vowels than Mentawai. Culturally, both communities retain ancestral-spirit traditions and subsistence practices, although their kinship systems differ. The findings indicate relatedness without dialectal identity and underline the distinctiveness of Enggano within the western Sumatran barrier-island linguistic setting.

References

1. Austin, P., & McGill, S. (2003). Language documentation and description (pp. 12-23).

2. Budiono, S. (2021). Status vitalitas bahasa Mentawai dialek Sipora [The vitality status of Mentawai language in Sipora-Pagai dialect in Mentawai Island Regency]. Journal of Indonesian Society, 47(2), 167-182.

3. Edwards, O. (2015). The position of Enggano within Austronesian. Oceanic Linguistics, 54, 109.

4. Erni, N. F. N., Taha, M., Febriningsih, F., Wijaya, D., & Garing, J. (2022). Bahasa Lorang, Bahasa Barakai, dan Bahasa Dobel di Kepulauan Aru dalam kajian leksikostatistik. Kandai, 18(1), 61-79.

5. Fachruliansyah, I. (2019). Suku bangsa Enggano dalam perdebatan rumpun bangsa dan bahasa Austronesia: Suatu tinjauan antropologis. Antropologi Indonesia, 40(1), 19.

6. Ferdyani, H. R., Ramdan, A. S., & Hidayat, R. (2023). Comparative phonology of Indonesian and French. Phonology: Journal of English Language and Literature Science, 1(4), 229-233.

7. Fitrianti, E. (2018). Interference of Mentawai language phonology into Indonesian students class XI SMA Negeri I Southern District Regency of Mentawai Islands. Journal of RESIDUE, 2(7), 6-15.

8. Hamid, S. A., Aman, R., Kechot, A. S., & Othman, S. (2016). Exploration of Malay attachment forms through language diversity: Comparison of phonology of Sadong Malay of Sarawak with Malay Peninsula Malay. Geography, 12(11).

9. Kähler, H. (1940). Grammatischer Abriss des Enggano. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen Sprachen, 30, 81-117.

10. Kaprisma, H., & Yuwono, U. (2014). Coastal culture of the West Sumatra: Language and rites as symbolic power. In Second International Conference on Asian Studies (p. 32).

11. Loeb, E. M. (1972). Sumatra: Its history and people. Oxford University Press.

12. Nainggolan, M. C., Naomi, N., Siregar, I., & Purnomo, B. (2023). Looking at the maritime culture of coastal communities around Java Island in 1920. Krinok: Journal of History and History Education, 2(1), 102-110. https://doi.org/10.22437/krinok.v2i1.24261

13. Nothofer, B. (1986). The barrier island languages in the Austronesian language family. Focal 11: Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, 87-109. https://doi.org/10.15144/PL-C94.87

14. Rahayu, N. (2014). Indonesian on Enggano ethnicity: Access and change. Proceedings of the National Seminar 'Language in Globalization Perspective', Bengkulu, Indonesia, 267-272.

15. Ratnaningsih, D. (2023). The nature of language in general. LMS SPADA Kemdikbud. https://lmsspada.kemdikbud.go.id/mod/page/view.php?id=113461

16. Shin, C., Gedat, R., & Mis, M. A. (2019). Remun language in Sarawak state: A comparative study of Remun and Iban in Sarawak. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 203. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-11

17. Simanjuntak, T. (2015). Progres penelitian Austronesia di Nusantara. Amerta, 33(1), 25-44.

18. Sugiyono. (2022). Regional language protection within the national language policy framework. Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. https://badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/artikel-detail/797/pelindungan-bahasa-daerah-dalam-kerangka-kebijakan-nasional-kebahasaan

19. University of Oxford. (2023). Enggano. https://enggano.ling-phil.ox.ac.uk/

20. Wiratno, T., & Santosa, R. (2014). Introduction to general linguistics. Open University, 1-19.

21. Yoder, B. E. (2011). Phonological and phonetic aspects of Enggano vowels.

22. Zachariah, I. (2017). Mentawai culture on the brink of extinction. Kompas.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-09

How to Cite

Sangian, E. Z., Rullyanti, M., & Putra, D. A. (2026). Language Typology In Barrier Islands Of Sumatra: A Phonological Comparison Between Enggano And Mentawai Language. Multidisciplinary Journals, 3(3), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.37676/mj.v3i3.1832

Issue

Section

Articles