Effective Communication of Family Hope Program (PKH) Facilitators to Beneficiary Families (KPM): A Study of P2K2 Activities in Kandang Mas Village, Bengkulu City

Authors

  • Enjli Lia Liken Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Vethy Octaviani Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Yanto Yanto Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37676/sosj.v2i2.759

Keywords:

Effective Communication, PKH Facilitators, P2K2 Activities, Beneficiary Families, Social Program Outreach

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effective communication practices employed by facilitators of the Family Hope Program (PKH) in delivering Family Capacity Building Meetings (P2K2) to Beneficiary Families (KPM) in Kandang Mas Village, Bengkulu City. Using a descriptive qualitative method, the study applies the communication effectiveness model by Cutlip and Allen, which includes seven key indicators: Credibility, Context, Content, Clarity, Continuity and Consistency, Communication Channels, and Audience Capability.Findings reveal that communication is effective across all seven indicators. The facilitators' credibility is supported by formal recognition from the Ministry of Social Affairs and emotional bonds with the KPM. The communication context is enhanced through inclusive atmospheres, appropriate teaching media, and flexible scheduling. The content is delivered using official modules in simple language and practical examples. Clarity is achieved via structured messaging, while consistency is maintained through repeated but varied messages. Communication channels include a blend of digital tools like WhatsApp and face-to-face interactions. The facilitators also tailor their approach based on the educational and social background of the KPM, ensuring comprehension and active participation. Ultimately, P2K2 activities have succeeded in raising awareness, improving knowledge and skills, and encouraging behavioral change among KPM. This study underscores the critical role of tailored, multi-dimensional communication strategies in optimizing the impact of social programs like PKH.

References

Abu Huraerah. Pengorganisasian Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat. Model Dan Strategi Pembangunan Berbasis Masyarakat. Bandung: Humaniora, Penerbit Buku Pendidikan Anggota IKAPI. 2008, hlm. 50.

Agus M.Hardjana. 2016. Ilmu Komunikasi.Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Andrew E. Sikula. 2017. Komunikasi Bisnis. Surakarta, Erlangga.

Aniendhita paramitha. 2019. Komunikasi efektif komunitas Rumah Baca (RBK) dalam meningkatkan minat baca pada anak-anak di dusun kanoman, Yogyakarta.

Aribowo & Sutiaputri. L.F 2019. Implementasi Pertemuan Peningkatan Kemampuan Keluarga (P2K2) Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) di Komunitas Adat Kampung Kuta, Desa Karang Peninggal. Kecamatan Tambaksari Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Ilmiah Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Sosial, /(1), Article 1.

Asian Development Bank. 2018. Republic of Indonesia. Building inclusive social assistance https://www.bkkbn.go.id/. 2011. Batasan Dalam Aktivitas Bisnis. Yogyakarta, PT Buku Seru.

dan Pengertian MDK. Https://Www.Bkkbn.Go.Id/.

Deddy Mulyana. 2015. Komunikasi Bisnis Peran Komunikasi Interpersonal. Komunikasi Efektif. Bandung, PT Rosdakarya, Direktur Jenderal Perlindungan Dan Jaminan Sosial. 2016. Pedoman Umum Keluarga Harapan. Jakarta, Kementrian Sosial RI. Indonesia Tahun 2018 Nomor 187. 29 Januari 2018. Jakarta.

Jalaluddin Rakhmat. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung, PT Remaja Rosdakarya,2004. h.13.

Jihan afiza. Dkk. 2021. Penerapan komunikasi efekrif 7c dalam pelayanan informasi publik oleh kantor pelayanan kekayaan Negara dan lelang jakarta II. Jakarta, Vol. 3. Hal. 111-125.

Kementerian Sosial. 2021. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Program Keluarga Harapan.

Masyarakat. Model Dan Strategi Pembangunan Berbasis Masyarakat.

Moleong. L. J. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Moleong. Lexy J. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Peraturan Menteri Sosial. Program Keluarga Harapan. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018 Nomor 187. 29 Januari 2018. Jakarta.

Rahmawati. E. Kisworo. B. 2017. Peran Pendamping dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Miskin melalui Program Keluarga Harapan. Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment. 12. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jnfc/article/view/16271/10134

Rustanto Bambang. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif Pekerjaan Sosial. Bandung, PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Silalahi, Ulber. 2009. Metode Penelitian Sosial. Bandung, Refika Aditama.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung, PT Alfabet.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatig, dan R&D. penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung.

Undang-undang Nomor 11 tahun 2009 tentang Kesejahteraan Sosial.

Undang-undang nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak pada pasal 1 ayat (14) yang dimaksud pendamping adalah pekerja sosial yang mempunyai kompetensi professional dalam bidangnya.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-07

How to Cite

Liken, E. L., Octaviani, V., & Yanto, Y. (2025). Effective Communication of Family Hope Program (PKH) Facilitators to Beneficiary Families (KPM): A Study of P2K2 Activities in Kandang Mas Village, Bengkulu City. Social Sciences Journal, 2(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.37676/sosj.v2i2.759

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.