Analysis of Investigative Services in Disclosing State Financial Losses: A Case Study of the State Assets and Auction Services Office (KPKNL)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70963/jam.v3i1.1673Keywords:
Investigative Services, State Financial Losses, Asset RecoveryAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of the Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL) in supporting investigative services for uncovering state financial losses. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method through direct observation and interviews conducted at KPKNL. The findings indicate that KPKNL plays a significant role in supporting investigative processes through state asset management, state receivable administration, asset valuation, debtor tracing, field verification, document validation, and the auction of confiscated assets and court-decided properties. In addition, risk management of state receivables is implemented through collection procedures, field examinations, and legal actions against uncooperative debtors. Although KPKNL does not have direct authority to conduct investigations or criminal inquiries, its functions contribute substantially to asset recovery efforts and support transparent and accountable state financial governance. The study concludes that KPKNL serves as an important supporting institution in the process of uncovering and recovering state financial losses.
References
1. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2022). Occupational fraud 2022: A report to the nations. ACFE.
2. Anggraini, D., Triharyati, E., & Novita, H. A. (2019). Akuntansi forensik dan audit investigatif dalam pengungkapan fraud. COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 2(2), 372–380.
3. Ardiansyah, S. S. (2023). Pengaruh whistleblowing, akuntansi forensik, dan audit investigasi dalam mendeteksi fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 19(2).
4. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Ikhtisar hasil pemeriksaan semester I tahun 2023. BPK RI.
5. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
6. Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Negara. (2024). Profil dan tugas Kantor Pelayanan Kekayaan Negara dan Lelang (KPKNL). Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
7. Hidayat, S. (2021). Pendekatan investigatif dalam pengawasan pengelolaan keuangan negara. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Audit Pemerintah, 9(1), 66–79.
8. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Pengelolaan keuangan dan kekayaan negara. Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.
9. Lestari, R., & Kurniawan, L. (2023). Optimalisasi aset sitaan negara dalam mendukung asset recovery. Jurnal Kekayaan Negara, 8(1), 134–148.
10. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Asset recovery and financial investigation frameworks. OECD Publishing.
11. Putri, M. A., Handayani, S., & Firmansyah, D. (2022). Asset tracing dan asset recovery dalam penanganan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keuangan Negara, 5(3), 201–214.
12. Sakinah, N. S., Kurniawan, P. C., & Furqon, I. K. (2023). Peran akuntan forensik dan teknik audit investigatif dalam pengungkapan fraud di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 2(1), 82–88.
13. Tarigan, A. (2019). Nilai pembuktian laporan hasil pemeriksaan (LHP) penghitungan kerugian negara yang dibuat oleh inspektorat dalam proses penanganan perkara tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Rokan Hilir. Panji Keadilan, 2.
14. Transparency International Indonesia. (2022). Penguatan tata kelola dan pencegahan korupsi di Indonesia. Transparency International Indonesia.
15. Tuanakotta, T. M. (2020). Akuntansi forensik dan audit investigatif. Salemba Empat.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nayla Maulidya Safira, Adryan Gymnastiar , Aryo Andika Supari, Ernawaty Usman, Abdul Kahar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
