The Effect Of Transactional Leadership, Incentives, Instrinctive Motivation And Hofstede Culture On Working Practice (Study Of DLH Empat Lawang Case)

Anwar Husin; Lin Yan Syah Syah; Harun Samsuddin

doi:10.37676/mj.v1i2.476

Authors

Anwar Husin Universitas Selero Lahat
Lin Yan Syah Syah Universitas Selero Lahat
Harun Samsuddin Universitas Selero Lahat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37676/mj.v1i2.476

Keywords:

Transactional Leadership, Incentives, Intrinsic Motivation, Hofstede Culture, Work Performance

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the influence of Transactional Leadership, Incentives,Intrinsic Motivation, and Hofstede Culture on Work Performance at the Empat Lawang RegencyEnvironmental Service Office, both partially and simultaneously. The research method used in thisresearch is a quantitative method using questionnaires distributed to respondents. Test data qualityusing validity tests, reliability tests, normality tests. The analysis used is multiple linear regression analysis, partial test, simultaneous test, and coefficient of determination. The results of thediscussion and analysis show that Transactional Leadership, Incentives and Intrinsic Motivation are proven to have a significant effect on work performance. Meanwhile, Hofstede Culture does not have a significant effect on Job Performance at the Empat Lawang Regency Environmental Service Office.

References

Anoraga, P. 2014. Psikologi Kerja. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto S, 2013, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Bawono Anton, 2006, Multi Variate Analisis dengan SPSS, STAIN Salatiga Press, Salatiga.

Dessler. Gary. 2015. Human Resources Management (Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia), Edisi Empat Belas Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Indeks.

Ghozali, Imam. 2015, Konsep, Teknik, Aplikasi Menggunakan Smart PLS 3.0 Untuk Penelitian Empiris, BP Undip.

Handoko, T. Hani. 2016. Manajemen. Yogyakarta : BPFE

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P, 2017, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Askara Jakarta.

Irham, Fahmi. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung. Penerbit: Alfabeta.

Jones, Gareth R. 2010. Organizational Theory, Design, and Change, Pearson Education, Inc: Prentice Hall.

Juharni. 2017. Manajemen Mutu Terpadu. Makasar : CV SAH MEDIA.

Kartono, Kartini. 2016. Pemimpin dan Kepemimpinan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.

Lubis, SM. 2017. Hubungan Motivasi Kerja Dengan Etos Kerja Karyawan Di Mawar Bakery & Cake Shop. UMA. Medan.

Luthans, Fred. 2014. Perilaku Organisasi, (Alih Bahasa V.A Yuwono, dkk), Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Yogyakarta.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Margono, 2017, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Martoyo, Susilo. 2015. Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia, edisi ketiga Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Munandar, A.S. 2011. Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi. Jakarta: Universitas 116 Indonesia (UI-Press)

Ndraha, Taliziduhu. 2011. Kybernologi (Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Rahmanda, F. P. (2017). Pengaruh Insentif terhadap Motivasi dan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan PT. Jamsostek (Persero) Cabang Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis S1 Universitas Brawijaya, 3(2), 1-10.

Rivai, Veithzal S. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan . Edisi ke-7. Depok: PT RAJAGRAFINDO.

Robbins, Stephen P. Timothy A. Judge. 2016. Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 16. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Siagian, Sondang P. 2015. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Akarsa

Simarmata, et al. 2021. Manajemen Mutu Pendidikan. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Sugiyono, 2016, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Alfabeta, Bandung.

Sulistio, R., & Suprihhadi, H. (2016). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Dan Kinerja. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Manajemen (JIRM), 5(12), 1- 20.

Wibowo, 2017, Manajemen Kinerja Edisi Kelima, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.