Analysis Of Non-Physical Work Environment And Work-Life Balance On Employee Productivity At Coffeenatics

Sugianto Sugianto; Nashrudin Setiawan; Muhammad Yalzamul Insan

doi:10.37676/sosj.v3i2.1853

Authors

Sugianto Sugianto University Pembangunan Panca Budi
Nashrudin Setiawan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi
Muhammad Yalzamul Insan Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37676/sosj.v3i2.1853

Keywords:

Non-Physical Work Environment, Work-Life Balance, Employee Productivity, Mixed Methods, Coffee Industry

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of the non-physical work environment and work-life balance on the productivity of operational employees at Coffeenatics. The methodology employed is mixed methods with a sequential explanatory approach, where the quantitative phase involved 40 employees using saturated sampling (census), and the qualitative phase utilized in-depth interviews with three key informants from the Bar, Kitchen, and Floor departments. Quantitative data were tested using multiple linear regression analysis via SPSS, while qualitative data were processed through thematic analysis. Statistical result indicate that, partially, the non-physical work environment has a positive but non-significant effect on productivity (p=0.057 > 0.05) because daily output is primarily dictated by standardized SOPs and order volume rather than social proximity. Conversely, work-life balance shows a significant positive influence (p=0.038 < 0.05) as the assurance of rest time and physical recovery is crucial for shift workers to maintain mental focus and minimize human error. Simultaneously, both variables significantly affect productivity with a contribution (R-Square) of 42%, while the remaining 58% is influenced by other external factors. This research concludes that the synergy between physical-mental fitness through life balance and emotional support in the workplace is the fundamental pillar in optimizing operational efficiency within the specialty coffee industry.

References

1. Andika, R., Widjarnako, B., & Ahmad, R. (2019). Pengaruh motivasi kerja dan persaingan kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja melalui kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel intervening pada pegawai Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Medan. Jurnal Manajemen Tools, 11(1), 189–198,.

2. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Laporan PDB Sektor Makanan dan Minuman Tahun 2025. Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS,.

3. Bate’e, Y., Zega, Y., Gulo, H., & Hulu, P. F. (2025). Pengaruh work-life balance terhadap produktivitas pegawai pada Kantor KPU Kota Gunungsitoli. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 4(3), 4584-4595,.

4. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications,.

5. Dwitama, F., & Ariyanto, E. (2024). Pengaruh work life balance dan lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap kinerja pegawai pada Badan Kepegawaian Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat yang dimediasi kepuasan. INFER: Jurnal Informatika Ekonomi Bisnis, 6(3), 612-617,.

6. Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: A measure of work-nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456,.

7. Gallup. (2025). State of the global workplace: Southeast Asia report. Washington, DC: Gallup,.

8. Haier. (2024). Work-life balance and productivity: A longitudinal study on cognitive fatigue and sustained attention. (Dokumen Internal/Penelitian Mandiri),.

9. Insan, M. Y., & Batubara, S. S. (2025). Peran Disiplin dan Motivasi Kerja dalam Meningkatkan Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan. Maneggio: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Manajemen, 8(2), 109-113,.

10. Nurfadhilah. (2022). Pengaruh work life balance dan lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap produktivitas kerja karyawan (Studi pada PT. Inoac Polyurethane Indonesia). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Forkamma, 5(3), 224-233,.

11. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson,.

12. Saputra, F., Ali, H., Hadita, H., Sawitri, N. N., & Navanti, D. (2024). Analisis work life balance dan fasilitas kerja terhadap produktivitas karyawan melalui motivasi kerja pada PT Inovan Digital Nusantara. Siber Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Multi Talenta (JKMT), 2(4),.

13. Sedarmayanti. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia: Reformasi birokrasi dan manajemen pegawai negeri sipil. Bandung, Indonesia: Refika Aditama,.

14. Setiawan, A., jailani, syahran, & Risnita. (2025). Penelitian Metode Campuran (Mixed Method). Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 1484–1491,.

15. Setiawan, N., & Ritonga, H. (2018). Pengaruh pengawasan, lingkungan kerja dan komitmen kerja terhadap produktivitas kerja di Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi Medan. JUMANT, 8(2), 79-86,.

16. Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta,.

17. Suhartini. (2021). Pengaruh work life balance dan lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap kinerja karyawan di PT Polychem Indonesia Tbk. (Divisi Mesin). eCo-Buss, 3(3), 122-131,.

18. Sujarweni, V. W. (2020). Metodologi penelitian: Lengkap, praktis, dan mudah dipahami. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Baru Press,.

19. Sutisna, H. W. (2023). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja non fisik dan work life balance terhadap loyalitas karyawan Rooftop Coffe Ujungberung (Skripsi tidak diterbitkan). Universitas Informatika dan Bisnis Indonesia, Bandung,.

20. Sutrisno, E. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kencana,.

21. Wibowo, M., Al Musadieq, M., & Nurtjahjono, G. E. (2014). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja karyawan (Studi pada karyawan PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk. Kandatel Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 16(1),.

22. Wijayanto, N. W., Suroto., & Wahyuni, I. (2020). Hubungan work-life balance dan lingkungan kerja non fisik terhadap kepuasan kerja perawat di RSUD Dr. R. Soedjati Kabupaten Grobogan. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat (e-Journal), 8(5), 606-613,.

23. Yanti, E. D., Macia Sari, M., Ardian, N., & Hasibuan, R. S. (2024). Analysis of factors affecting the work productivity of MSME actors: A case study of human resources and competency development in Pematang Serai Village. Jurnal Ekonomi, Akutansi Dan Manajemen Nusantara, 3(1), 1–7,.